The philosopher Alain said: "When I am asked if the division between parties of the right and of the left, between people of the left and of the right, still makes any sense, the first thing that occurs to me is that whoever asks the question is certainly not from left". I believe that this is still true today and that it also applies to the question of apoliticalism. Governments have tried to "neutralize" the figure of the intellectual by constituting the figure of the "expert" intellectual, who would be objective and "neutral" and would make a neutral diagnosis that would guide public policies. But no diagnosis is neutral, and objectivity is not the same as neutrality. The figure of the technocrat was built against the Marxist intellectuals. Intellectuals who call themselves apolitical are often center-right. On the other hand,1.
You have recently published Can the work be separated from the author? , a book in which he addresses the issue of the relationship between the Whatsapp Mobile Number List author and the morality of the work. Although you maintain that this is an old controversy, why do you think it has become so popular today? Is an apolitical intellectual conceivable? When you talk about the responsibility of the writer, are you thinking about it?
It has been and what has been called cancel culture that has made these debates very current, through the practices of boycotting works produced by authors who have incurred in maneuvers or takes reprehensible positions and which have been met with public protest. For example, during the premiere of J'accuse [in Spanish, The officer and the spy] by Roman Polanski, and during the César ceremony, from which actress Adèle Haenel walked out in protest when Polanski was awarded. To this is added the attempt to rehabilitate figures such as the French Action leader Charles Maurras in the context of the growth of the extreme right, or to reissue writings such as the anti-Semitic pamphlets of Louis-Ferdinand Céline. In addition, Céline and Maurras were included in the Book of national commemorations in France, which sparked controversy.